As an Executive Architect from the Inspire team at ServiceNow, I regularly meet with executives who are struggling with their Order to Cash (O2C) process. As a matter of fact, most of the large enterprises are either considering or in the process of revising their O2C process to further simplify and standardize it . When the O2C End-to-End (E2E) Value Chain activities happen as expected, there are no real problems as most of the activities take place within the ERP system. It is however in case of process exceptions that the situation gets more complicated. Those exceptions are generally handled on an ad-hoc basis and as such they may require involvement of various teams and departments, which may not be as responsive or willing as expected.
There is a huge opportunity for simplification, standardization and consolidation for O2C process exception activities. Many of these exceptions are handled with manual or ad-hoc procedures, with the effect of slowing down the O2C End-to-End, increasing its cost of execution and affecting the customer satisfaction and user experience. Here are a couple of examples that are commonly seen across the enterprises landscape:
Every company around the world is initiating process simplification initiatives to avoid exceptions where possible, and streamline the process of handling and resolving them where they cannot be avoided.
How would you reduce the number of exceptions that are occurring?
Identify the top recurring exceptions that generate the most workload. There are many data sources that can be used. As they are not structured, it might be difficult to mine the data, so assigning someone to focus on this task may be a good approach. Some ideas on the possible sources of information:
First focus on the "big fish" exceptions that don't require a significant effort to resolve, to bring greater value in a shorter time. Using pareto charts, identify the recurring exceptions that generate the biggest operational workload and/or O2C processing delays. Starting with the most impactful, try to identify the root cause before looking for fixes. Why are those exceptions triggered, why are those consistency checks failing, why is the data missing or incorrect, why is the customer always asking that question, etc. Using some Problem-Solving techniques such as the "5 why's", the "Ishikawa Fishbone" or running more formal DMAIC projects, try to eliminate issue occurrence where possible.
Not every exception can be eliminated though. For those that can't, it is essential that a predefined, repeatable and measurable process is used to increase speed, quality and experience. Such a process would typically be triggered by an event (manually by someone or automatically by a system), and would need to be processed by one or multiple actors as part of an E2E workflow. While many hundreds of people from different departments need to be involved to resolve financial, supply chain, legal, sales issues and more, there is a need to utilize a common platform to dispatch, orchestrate and measure that work from an E2E perspective, and link it to the original sales order, customer complaint or customer request.
In the past years, we have seen our customers adopting Service Management concepts for the Enterprise. This consists of building a catalog of Enterprise Services that can be requested for the identified exceptions and predefined processes, with automatic dispatching of the work to the appropriate team(s). A powerful workflow engine allows the definition of more advanced processes that may need to orchestrate multiple tasks based on specific conditions and sequencing. And predefined Service Level Agreements (SLAs) will set expectations for the requestors, so they know upfront when the exception will be handled or the service delivered.
Some examples from our customers:
With this iterative process, the process automation opportunities need to be continuously identified through sustainable measures defined in Step 1. A monthly review of those highly recurring exceptions that are manually handled will help achieve long-term savings while delivering short-term concrete benefits.
Those benefits need to be measured too, so the investments can be justified and the return on investment recognized. This is something that is often overlooked and the consequence are that the key stakeholders will only see the amount of money injected in these initiatives without understanding their value. Continuously communicating about those initiatives and their success is a critical success factor for the simplification, standardization and automation of those processes.
Service Management for the Enterprise will not only simplify and standardize the processes, but will also provide a gold mine of data that can be exploited through Process Analytics. Measuring the O2C E2E Cycle time, the time wasted in a particular state, the top 10 exceptions causing delays or waste, etc. will not only provide insights for the Continual Service Improvement (CSI), but will also provide trends on the benefits of CSI initiatives.
The aforementioned recommendations not only apply to Order to Cash, but also to all other Business Processes such as Source to Pay, Record to Report, Hire to Retire, Plan to Produce, etc. The following benefits would typically be realized through such initiatives:
Share your experience on the Business Process simplification / standardization initiatives in your enterprise. What are you putting in place to streamline your processes? Are you considering Service Management for the Enterprise?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.